Today in the campus newspaper I read a headline story about a small group of people who resented gender roles and predefined sets of male and female, and fight this trend by crossdressing.
Excuse me? It was so absurd I didn't get it the first five times. So they are trying to counteract social stereotypes by dressing up as women if they're guys? And is women's clothing not 'stereotypical
But one of the more absurd comments I read was "I think I'm two-fifths male". Well pardon my disbelief, but unless you're a partial hermaphrodite, I'm not inclined to believe you in the least. Sure you can have a 'male' personality, but for you to attribute certain traits to male or female, you are the one who is segregating male and female gender traits and roles. None of us freaking care if you act 'like a guy' when you're a girl, but you feel the need to point out that you're acting like a guy when gender doesn't matter?
It was just idiotic to read about. But now I've made you guys hear it, so I guess I'm only making things worse? :P
http://www.qwa
Today's (10/17/08) Dinosaur comic was epic awesomeness. And if it felt like XKCD, well it's because Randall did it :P But it's still win. The only regret I have for it is that I don't think the comic frames in Dino Comics represent the Golden Section, which would really have had to make it the most beautiful comic on Earth, for its geometric elegance. But nonetheless, if you do not read Dino comics, at least read today's (Friday, October 17th). Naow.
I have a diary link at the top of my ET page now to my own diary. Thanks, but it pushes the buttons onto a third line on my screen. Make it go away now. Yes, I apparently am requesting this of you, whoever is reading this entry.
Random thought while taking a break from writing essays.
I just saw a picture of Balthier (the sky pirate from FF XII) and underneath it said "who wouldn't love Balthier, no?" I just want to know. Why do people love pirates? As far as I can tell, their defining characteristic
You can set your language on Facebook to pirate. Z.o.m.g.
Hehe, today's XKCD has created a lot of fun flash links in the forums. Here's one that's similar to Portal, with several references. I have not played either of it's sequels, just because I didn't want to ruin the concept. http://www.kor
More stumble fun:
For iippo mostly, but others will like: http://video.s
Nerd drumline: http://video.s
More spoiled cats: http://video.s
Weird squishy toys: http://video.s
Got a bit of feedback regarding the clouds, so I submit this revision: Aradon's Workplace. Top image is new, bottom is from last diary entry. I removed the grain and dimmed the stars. iippo, you said you liked the grain, but lots of digital artists see grain as a deficiency as a result of a low-quality render. Let me know what you think of the smooth one versus the grain, whether it's an improvement or not :)
http://elftown
Comments/criti
Seriously you guys: http://video.s
Cats.
Also, 45 minute National Geographic video on Chinese weapons: http://video.s
Somewhat interesting at some points, but the last ten minutes are hardly worth watching. Flying Guillotine nothing -.-
Circle Versus Square : http://www.cir
Quite ruthless, below the belt, all-out fight for the supremacy of geometric shapes!
For all who are interested, I just finished up a (double-spaced) 15-page paper regarding the arguments for God's existence. I webbified it as best I could and put it on the wiki Templar's Arguments for God's Existence, in case anyone wanted to read some philosophical stuff. I thought you might like it, Silvie, because I spend a fair bit of time claiming that an infinite regress is impossible, and say that Aquinas' argument is the strongest of the three we read about. Considering the paper is titled "An Applause of the Cosmological Argument and Denial of the Infinite Series", I'm quite certain you'll approve :D
To any who read it, it may be best to copy and paste it into Word, though I fear you'll lose the italics if you do, and I really used those a lot when talking about Anselm's little trick with words :P
Further note: These are not my arguments for the existence, despite what the wiki name says. It's just my page. And the essay will be turned in shortly (like, 45 minutes after I make this post) so no stealey etc, intellectual property and rawr :D
Edit: Also, now it's time for my two page paper on Hindemith's "Harmonie Der Welt" for tomorrow ^^'
Diary note to self that is obviously not a personal entry for whatever reason: (laziness?)
The problem I've discussed on occasion with my 3D stuff is that it usually ends up looking flat, like they all have the same perspective. Well, that was the issue, believe it or not. Change the perspective, and the picture looks different. It took me months to make this conclusion, so apparently A=A and therefore change A, and I change A. It's groundbreaking logic. To a one-year old, maybe XD
But perhaps to be more fair to me, I knew I needed to change perspective and exactly how to do so eluded me. But I kept saying, "it probably has to do with the zoom feature" which would change perspective. Astonishingly, I believe the zoom slider is actually labeled 'orthographic perspective' on Terragen 2. Still couldn't really be sure it would change the perspective apparently :P In any case, I've decided once and for all that the zoom is in fact the feature I need to use to give my pictures a different feel to them, one that places the viewer into the picture rather than outside the picture. See, I couldn't tell how to use the zoom feature, because I pulled the slider to one side or the other, getting really extreme effects. I have not tested, but I would bet that I need very slight variances to get proper effect. Of course, I had no idea what zoom really did, since the effects were kind of vague and hard to predict.
Today, though, I was looking at nature and said, "Zoom would do that." Don't ask me how I know; apparently intuition at times sees it reasonable to put knowledge into your head that you could have sworn it never had. But I was marveling at a view of clouds that I had today, because it was in a wide-screen view (of the long window of a bus, so it was framed essentially) and the ground/trees seemed to form a sort of inverted semi-circle underneath that managed to frame the bottom of the scene but provide no obstruction to the clouds. Which is rare. Usually I have to crane my neck or walk somewhere else to get an unobstructed view of the sky, and usually the elsewhere has it's own obstructions. So I was rather pleased with discovering this brief moment of wide screen cloud footage :D
But it seemed to me that the clouds were of larger size than they should be, compared to the world around me. I figured that it seemed like the camera brought the clouds closer to the scene while the ground stayed in the same spot, but they appeared smaller too. So my mind said, "zooming in will make the center of the image appear the same distance away, but rather than fill in the whole screen with the image, it sort of diminishes what appears on the outer edges of the picture." In other words, to get a proper cloudscape in a digital program, perhaps I should increase the zoom a little with the camera directed at the clouds. The ground should seem to shrink in size compared to the feature. In any case, whether this is the proper application, it seems I now know the use of the zoom feature, and it is to put the image in the appropriate perspective, so the viewer gets the impression of having things to look to at his or her left or right as well as what's shown in the picture. I couldn't put my finger on exactly what it was before, but this was the problem and now is the solution :D
Suggested reading along the lines of which I've seen Viking post:
Science will be the death of us all- coming to a Hadron Collider near Earth, Sept. 10!
http://www.cra
Psychology shows we're all jerks at heart-
http://www.cra
Some freaky weird mental disorders?
http://www.cra
So philosophy class is pretty much my favorite class evar, without question. Until this afternoon, at least, when I went to composition class and we spent like half an hour just listening to how four pitches could sound if you placed them in different arrangements of the octave <3
http://www.bal
Interesting page. The site sells books publishing digital artwork. All very expensive to buy, but it allows a book-preview if you select a specific book and look for the preview part. I glanced through a number of books. The artwork all looked very nice. Might be worth a glance sometime, though I wish I could look at the pictures in larger detail :P Lots of architectural stuff, mostly in the Elemental series, but there are other things in there too.
Aradon's Workplace . It's coming along. Flowers are still too big, I think, but I am rather pleased with them considering I made them from scratch :P Still missing the grass though. I'll add that in next, then unless I'm missing something obvious, I mess with the clouds once more. Any comments now would be appreciated, before things get ultrafinalized
Oh, and blue and red stuff on Elftown when you mouse over things o.O I don't like the constantly morphing boxes. It's like, "I click here o.O my browser just readjusted itself just so I can type here." No thanks. (In regards to the 'comment' box and the 'goto wiki' box in the right, and all those sorts of things.)
Hurray, the notifications that I want are at the top now :)