# of watchers: 14
| D20: 14 |
Wiki-page rating | Stumble! |
Informative: | 0 |
Artistic: | 0 |
Funny-rating: | 0 |
Friendly: | 0 |
2006-06-08 [Indelible]: we got kinda carried away... it happens
2006-06-08 [Mataza_71191]: ok
2006-06-08 [Indelible]: i almost forgot i should add some more content to this place... i've been so busy with my contest and all... also with my own wiki...:P
2006-06-08 [Mataza_71191]: ah
2006-06-08 [Indelible]: yep... so do you have any questions... i hardly feel like a teacher:P im gunna make up my own lessons soon:P
2006-06-08 [Mataza_71191]: ok no questions yet
2006-08-28 [mattpoi]: just something you might want to know, i saw a guy a few weeks ago wielding three 'swords' not sure of names and such but he used two with handles and one like a curved blade with no handle, double edged which he manipulated with the first two, spinning it like a devilstick but also throwing and cutting with amasing accuracy (put out a few candles!!), it was for a show but im sure it has to be based on an actual fighting style
2006-08-28 [Mataza_71191]: hmmmmm that sounds cool....
2006-08-29 [Son Goku]: that would take lots of skill, but in war, in a real FIGHT... shoot, no way that would ever work. based on an actual fighting style? sounds more like a juggler moving into the "intense" range ^___^. but hey, i could be wrong :). still very cool tho. :)
2006-08-29 [Mataza_71191]: with me i might use 2 swords but 1 would be used for blocking mostly i foucs on one blade at a time..
2006-08-29 [Lady of Lore]: I'd be stuck with one since one can be confusung enough on its own.
2006-08-29 [Mataza_71191]: like i said one for def one for atack cus i suck that bad
2006-08-29 [Lady of Lore]: lol
2006-08-30 [Mataza_71191]: well i do i gotta get distance or i might as well go hand to hand :(
2006-08-30 [Lady of Lore]: true but if you go too much distance, if the enemy gets within the circle of your movement then it's a lot harder to fight.....a mixture of all types is good...^_^ Chracter's i've created have had a dagger or short swordas well as a javelin or spear....
2006-08-30 [Mataza_71191]: hmm
2006-12-05 [Dumnorix]: "The rapier (sometimes referred to as the 'smallsword')" This is absolute tosh! A rapier and a smallsword are two completely different weapons, and their fencing schools also differ dramatically.
2006-12-06 [Lady of Lore]: Hmmm...interes
2006-12-13 [Dumnorix]: I have been studying and practising historical fencing for over three years; I'm the owner of several period weapons, including an XVIIIth century French smallsword; I have translated the works of great authors on the smallsword such as Liancour, L'Abbat, Girard, and Angelo, and have also read many treatises on the rapier, from Viggiani to Pacheco Narváez. Ah, and if you want a fine source, read "The Smallsword in England" by J.D. Aylward.
(BTW, I've applied for a course here, The Art of True Defence. If you're interested on learning on smallsword fencing, have a look ;) Oh, and PM me if you wish to discuss about the rapier, &c.
Basically, main differences between the two: A smallsword measures at most (total length) 100 cm. The longest rapiers reached 140 cm. The smallsword was in use in the second half of the XVIIth century and in the XVIIIth; its blade geometry is variable: Triangular, hexagonal, flat, diamond-shaped
The rapier: Extremely long, with highly developped handguards, with functional finger rings which make for a different way of gripping (the smallsword has a small guard and decorative pas-d'asnes). The point of balance is more towards the middle; rapiers are usually much heavier than smallswords (about 1kg or more, whereas smallswords were around 500g). The blade is invariably diamond-shaped or flat, and retains some edge, especially in the earlier models (late XVIth, early XVIIth centuries).
Smallsword fencing is fenced double time (as in parry/riposte) whereas rapier fencing is fenced single time (as in parry and counterattack in the same motion). This is due to the speed and balance of these weapons.
2006-12-13 [Dumnorix]: Oh, and about the width of blades: You'd be surprised at how wide rapier and smallsword blades are. The trick was hollowing the blades as much as possible to relieve the weight; colichemarde smallswords had an obscenely large forte, and the most common rapiers had blades well over 3cm wide.
2006-12-13 [Lady of Lore]: That's really very indepth! Thank you very much. I'll make the needed adjustments as soon as I have time. Thankyou!
Number of comments: 91 | Show these comments on your site |
Elftown - Wiki, forums, community and friendship.
|