2011-05-23 [Viking]: Can awesomeness, by it's nature, ever be intentional?

2011-05-23 [Avaz]: It is possible to manufacture glorious -nay, awesome- situations where, if everything goes according to plan, the result is pure awesomeness. But I also believe if the factors are just right, awesomeness happens on its own unintentionally, which is even moar awsum!

2011-05-23 [Paul Doyle]: It's better to BE the cheese, rather than being cheesed-on or cheesed-off. *nods somberly*

2011-05-23 [Viking]: It is better, by far, to be pissed off than to be pissed on.

2011-05-23 [Paul Doyle]: By the way: <poll:77323> and <poll:77325>. Yes, it's better to be pissed off than pissed on. But consider the plight of the pissoir AKA latrine or urinal? It does an honorable, honest job by taking the piss and keeping the immediate area far more sanitary than it might otherwise be. And yet . . . it is invariably pissed on, like so many people.

2011-05-23 [Paul Doyle]: (I linked your poll in my current "mood".)

2011-05-24 [Alexi Ice]: I'm inclined to think that unintentional awesomeness is better. Anyone can pre-determine being awesome. Not everyone can accidently be awesome.

2011-05-24 [Paul Doyle]: Not even Chuck Norris knew Chuck Norris was destined to be made of awesome.

2011-05-24 [Viking]: That's because he's not made of awesome.

2011-05-24 [Paul Doyle]: Tell that to Chuck :P

2011-05-24 [Viking]: I have. He cried. So did his beard.

2011-05-24 [Paul Doyle]: Bruce Dickinson must have been singing in the background as ol' Chuckie wept those disillusioned tears of woe. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=shfZzTJYZWs

"The Tears of the Dragon Chuckster"