# of watchers: 6
|
Fans: 0
| D20: 6 |
Wiki-page rating | Stumble! |
Informative: | 0 |
Artistic: | 0 |
Funny-rating: | 0 |
Friendly: | 0 |
2008-09-08 [Blood Raven]: Well, the comics tell us that in the end, none of the villains really die, but they all end up in Arkham Asylum. I assume this is where the Joker and Harvey end up, too.
I'm really curious who would be the next movies' bad guy. I mean, I don't see them topping Ledger's performance of the Joker, and honestly, I think it would damage his legacy to make another Joker movie, as much as I liked the part in the Dark Knight. Also, I think it wouldn't be a good idea to bring back Harvey. His part was nice, but it's rather finished, really.
Other than that, here's another little detail: you will notice the accountant hired by Wayne Enterprises is called Mister Reece ("Mysteries"), rumour goes he might be the Riddler. Who knows, maybe Jim Carrey's role will be refreshed as well :)
Another fact: Christian Bale has already said that if the next movie was to include Boy Wonder / Robin, he would quit. This means no poorly played horridly dressed teenager will take part in the third movie :D
2008-09-09 [iippo]: I've heard rumours of Riddler being involved, too... But his real name is Edward Nashton, isn't it? So I dunno how they'd work out that Coleman Reese is him... Sides, Riddler is a genius - Reese doesn't really seem it XD Although the Riddler does know Batman's identity, so it might tie in there, as Reese knows too.
I do think they'll need to make at least one more Batman. Make a trilogy of it at least. (Sides, it's going good, they are making lots of money of it... As long as they keep the quality up, I'll have no complaints :P)
2008-09-09 [Blood Raven]: Christian Bale signed a contract for three movies, so there will be a next one, unless there's a Robin or Mr. Freeze involved :)
And I don't think they're following the comics exactly. It's more a source of inspiration, I'd guess. Seeing some Batman comics really aren't all that great :P
So maybe Mister Reece is the Riddler after all, but he just needs to discover his diabolical intellect first XD
I do hope the bad guys will remain rather realistic and down-to-earth, like in Begin and Dark Knight. It wouldn't be very cool to have Poison Ivy run around being all half-plantish and ruining the dark feel of the movies.
2008-09-13 [windowframe]: Even the comics don't follow the comics exactly, so I guess there's no reason why the film should. :P
2008-09-19 [Duke Devlin]: That is a very good point, Silvie. XD Very little of the comics actually do follow eachother. :P
2008-09-26 [NamelessMerc]: Interjection on earlier point; Nobody seems to have thought what I did about Harvey's coin landing shiny-side-up at the end of the movie. I assumed (after the dialogue about Batman being framed) that it was to show how the world would see Harvey in the end, as his coin lands with the scratched side essentially buried in the dirt.
I'm looking forward to another Batman movie and, to be honest, I'd love it if they refreshed the Penguin, as good as the Riddler may be. The Penguin was always my favourite Batman villain; though how anyone would top Danny DeVito in Batman Returns is beyond me. That said, I used to think that about Jack Nicholson's Joker.
2008-09-26 [Blood Raven]: Well spoken X)
2008-09-29 [Duke Devlin]: Agreed! I did think the same about Nicholson's Joker, but Ledger blew that almost entirely out of the water! So I would be very interested to see how a director and actor could top Danny DeVito's work. :O
2008-09-29 [windowframe]: Nice idea about the coin, Merc, I certainly hadn't thought of that. :)
2008-10-01 [iippo]: That's a good one, Merc.
Edit the wiki with your observations, plz :3
2008-10-02 [NamelessMerc]: 0.0; Now I need to find a suitabe quote!
2008-10-02 [windowframe]: What about the one where they say he's Gotham's white knight?
2008-10-02 [NamelessMerc]: Hm, tempting. I'll try to find a transcript. I have one in mind.
2009-01-20 [windowframe]: I showed this film to one of my uni friends the other day because he hadn't seen it yet. Afterward, as is only natural he agreed that it was full of win. But one of the things he commented on was the subversion of order that happens throughout the film - example: when they're escorting Dent to the prison, the vehicle Joker sets on fire to divert them onto the lower road is a fire truck.
2009-01-20 [iippo]: Good one *adds* And no one gets credit here, muahaha
2009-01-20 [iippo]: And I just noticed that I an subconsciously only using Joker-quotes o.O *goes to lie down*
2009-05-01 [windowframe]: Another thought:
"Do I look like a man with a plan?" The Joker claims he has no plans, that he just acts without thinking - he's not a schemer. But at the end, after a whole series of elaborate plans and back-up plans that all inter-link, he admits to Batman, "You didn't think I'd risk losing the battle for Gotham's soul in a fistfight with you? No. You need an ace in the hole. Mine's Harvey." Apart from the fact that this shows that ultimately, the Joker knows exactly what he's doing (and knew exactly what to say to get Harvey to do what he wanted), it also plays on the theme of chance - Joker gets Harvey to start playing the chaos-game, represented by chance, but he, even as the ultimate representative of chaos doesn't use chance himself.
2009-05-01 [Duke Devlin]: I think that that is likely just an oversight on the part of the directors/whoe
2009-05-04 [iippo]: I wouldn't call it an over-sight, on the contrary, it's a very effective and subtle rhetoric device that works perfectly for the meaning/messag
Another thing about plans. Joker tells Harvey about all these schemers: the mob, the cops, Gordon... But those people actually don't really have plans. The mob is against the wall, not knowing what to do with the sudden cleansing going on in the city; the cops are running around in circles with their own problems of corruption within their force; Gordon is doing his best with the limited resources he has, but he is weak and vulnerable and afraid. But the one who really does have plans is Batman. His carefully crafted mission to get Lao back from China, for example. It's like clockwork. Batman and Joker and two sides of the same coin, destined to be locked in this back-and-forth battle with witty lines ('do you know how I got these scars?' -'No, but I know how you got these.' Or 'There's a little fight in you, I like that.' -'Then you're gonna love me.') forever, and in this film poor Harvey is a pawn in their game (in the comics he tends to be his own player, but the movie is pretty far from the comics - in a good way). Which to me suggests that you can't get anything done in Gotham without a mask, which is what they make Harvey wear after his death. In the world of the super-people (heroes and villains) the equilibrium remains: Joker won, he dragged Harvey down, but Batman also won by taking the blame and leaving Harvey spotless (stop me now, I'm doing a weird twisted Christian tilt on this thing, Batman taking away Harvey's sins though he himself is blameless... o.O )
2009-05-04 [windowframe]: *agrees with iippo that it's not just an oversight* Both parts (his elaborate plans and him saying he doesn't have plans) are too integral to the plot and characters for their failure to notice the contradictions to be anything but an epic oversight, and I think we can give them more credit than to assume such a epic fail on their part.
2009-05-06 [Duke Devlin]: :D Guess I didn't put much thought into that reply. ;) You make some very good points there, but I think I neglected to think about the fact that the Joker has no set personality. He reinvents himself every day, does he not? I seem to recall him changing a lot anyway. So really, the contradictions could be put down to that as well, right?
Number of comments: 28 | Show these comments on your site |
Elftown - Wiki, forums, community and friendship.
|